Ron Paul's opinion of Fox News, Fox interviewer Agrees!



Uploaded by: fagan411
Video Description:
Ron Paul gives his opinion of Fox News.
Americans, join the Ron Paul Revolution! http://www.ronpaul2008.com


Tags for this video: 2008 bias fascism fox main media MSM news Paul President Ron stream

Find more videos in the "News" category
See more videos uploaded by fagan411

Related Videos
Romney Booed For Attacking PaulRon Paul and Bill O'Reilly Duke It Out (09/10/07)Bill Maher: "Ron Paul the only sane man at the CNBC debate".
romney-booed-for-attacking-paul.htmlromney-booed-for-attacking-paul.htmlromney-booed-for-attacking-paul.html
Employees Expose FOX NEWS' DistortionsRon Paul puts Neil Cavuto on his ASS!!! 12-19-07Ron Paul w/ Dan Abrams CNBC (Must See!!!)
romney-booed-for-attacking-paul.htmlromney-booed-for-attacking-paul.htmlromney-booed-for-attacking-paul.html


Share This Video:       StumbleUpon       del.icio.us       Reddit       digg       Furl       Spurl       Simpy       YahooMyWeb


Comments for this video: Show || Hide
Comments for this video on YouTube
not really because ... ( 1 month ago by JPhillippeMusic)
not really because a lot of the media aimed towards mccain, especially fox news.
Like they always ... ( 1 month ago by iamwatchingus)
Like they always say, only ask the questions that will give you the right response. This guy prolly thought he was a news reporter. He works for Fixed News for heavens sake. Ron Paul was polite but he could have been more honest about his answer.
"How many Dems ... ( 1 month ago by Eikinkloster)
"How many Dems would have jumped ship on Obama?" 95% of Blacks and 67% of Latinos went on Obama, whereas whites kept their historical 43% dem 57% rep track. So the question is: would so many (minority) reps still have jumped ship to Obama if he was running aganst Ron Paul? Well, I doubt. Only another Black person will ever be able to beat Obama now, unless whites start voting racist like blacks and latinos.
sadly I think your ... ( 1 month ago by robinsl27)
sadly I think your right when I said that I would vote for ron paul I was called everything but a sell out. it is kind sad my people don't care what type of black president it is so long as it is a black president and I guarantee no matter what he does the media won't call him on it just so they won't be called racist
rofl i think it's ... ( 1 month ago by UFOBelieve)
rofl i think it's fair to guess that the reporter hasn't got a job by now ...
I just hope that ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
I just hope that Obama is one of the best Presidents we've had in recent memory.
The first-ever Black (or first-ever female, for that matter) President HAS to be. If a white male President messes up, we say, "Gee, that guy was a lousy President." But you know — you just KNOW — that if Obama messes up, all too many people will be saying, "See what happens if you let a Blac
k person* be President?" (* or less polite words to that effect) Ditto female, had Hillary won and messed up.
If only Ron Paul ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
If only Ron Paul had been all he claimed to be. I, too, believed in him, and you can see posts from me on his videos earlier this year supporting him.
But, he let me down. I don't mean by not doing better in the Primaries. I mean by his policies, his beliefs, his positions. He is NOT — repeat: *NOT* — a libertarian. He's a neo-confederate (NOT to be confused with a Neo-Conservative — he most definitely is NOT THAT!). This is a vital dist
inction.
interesting. never ... ( 1 month ago by hpso12xu)
interesting. never heard that one before. so, in regards to Ron Paul, can you please compare and contrast HIS relationship to libertarianism and neo-confederatism (if that's even an "ism").
Array ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
Sure thing!
A libertarian is one who holds the Inherent and Unalienable Rights of Personhood as the ultimate force in politics and government. A neo-confederate (so-named to distinguish them from the original Confederate States of America which included slavery) is one who holds that "States' Rights" is the
ultimate power. Now, what do we hear Ron Paul actually saying? "We don't dictate to the states" (true enough on the face of it).
But he's gone way ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
But he's gone way beyond that.
He has stated that the Bill of Rights does not apply to the States, that the Fourteenth Amendment was ratified under duress by the former Confederate States and so is invalid (which is how he can oppose Birthright Citizenship, which is explicitly stated in the Fourteenth). He has said that States
should even be able to establish official State religions! This would of course be VERY oppressive to the rights of the people of other religions in such States.
In word and deed, ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
In word and deed, he has made it clear that he places "States' Rights" ABOVE the Inherent and Unalienable Rights of Personhood.
Thus, he is no libertarian, but a neo-confederate. He calls himself "The Champion of the Constitution." But WHICH Constiutution? In 2003, in an essay on the alleged "War on Christmas," he wrote that the Declaration and Constitution are "both REPLETE WITH references to God."
Gee, you'd think ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
Gee, you'd think that the Champion of the Constitution would KNOW that the U.S. Constitution has ZERO references to God, other than a formal date in the accepted style of the time (spelling out the literal meaning of "Anno Domini" [what "A.D." in dates stands for]: "In the Year of Our Lord").
However, the Constitution of the CONFEDERATE States of America DOES explicitly invoke "Almighty God"! Is THAT the Constitution he's the "Champion" of!?
By the way, I put " ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
By the way, I put "States' Rights" in "scare quotes" every time I mention it for a REASON.
You see, there IS NOT NOW, nor was there EVER (even before the Civil War), nor was there ever INTENDED TO BE, ANY SUCH *THING* as "States' Rights"! The clear and plain language of the Declaration of Independence AND the Bill of Rights BOTH make plain that ONLY PERSONS have, or CAN have, RIGHTS! N
O Government at ANY level, or any OTHER non-Person entity, can have Rights of ANY kind!
the reporter, ... ( 1 month ago by Salvatrucho213)
the reporter, Camron, is Bush's friend
Carl Cameron's such ... ( 1 month ago by whoo689)
Carl Cameron's such a jackass. Look at the way he scowled at Paul when he's like "How are we doing?"
How do you recon he ... ( 1 month ago by AndersFriedrichsen)
How do you recon he is a neoconfederate? I do think he is right on the important issues, but I hardly have the time to go IN depth.
Read my responses ... ( 1 month ago by COMALiteJ)
Read my responses to hpso12xu from six days ago. I explained it in some more detail. I should also point out that he didn't just VOTE for, but actually AUTHORED and multiple times CO-SPONSORED, the horrendously mis-named "We the People Act" (most recently as H.R. 300). This was a direct attack on the Constitutional Separation of Powers and system of Checks and Balances that help protect individual Liberties and Rights. No Libertarian would do such a thing. That's Neo-Confederate stuff.
"States rights" ... ( 1 month ago by Shockna)
"States rights" isn't exactly a right in the way you're claiming Paul wants it to be, and he never said that. The concept of States Rights is based on the idea that power should never become too centralized; that a local government often knows how to govern better than a bureaucracy 2,000 miles away (Notwithstanding any state which denies personhood to anyone, for any reason; this is unacceptable). That said, HR 300 doesn't appear to "annihilate checks and balances" at all.
The real reason why ... ( 1 month ago by nowayjose470)
The real reason why ron Paul was excluded from the NH debates is NH has a lot of libertarian independents that would've voted for Ron Paul. A big showing would've given Ron Paul a lot of momentum and Foxnews, which was instrumental in getting him shut out, didn't want that to happen.
That reporter had ... ( 1 month ago by schlongy2dope)
That reporter had the kind of smug face u just wanna punch again and again!!!!!!!!!!1 hehehe
Just simple answers ... ( 4 weeks ago by RJWooller)
Just simple answers for difficult times, which demand much more thought-out and researched answers!!!
seriously. that ... ( 2 weeks ago by ragratt)
seriously. that dude creeped me the fuck out
Don't we all? What ... ( 6 days ago by jejojassy76)
Don't we all? What da hell does that mean?
The strange thing ... ( 3 days ago by Gangularis)
The strange thing is this guy is the same guy that humiliated paul during the debates by asking "do you have any, sir?" regarding the question of electability..



Tell a friend:


URL 
Embed Code 



hotel in dublin Szympans www.pozycjonowanie.mde.pl kurs prawa jazdy warszawa Potop